Can Coir Pith-Starch-Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Composite Sustain Zea mays Seedling Survival and Growth under Flood (Waterlog) Condition?
Chinyere Augusta Ajuzieogu *
Department of Microbiology, Federal University Otuoke, PMB 126, Yenegoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.
Queen Oke Ozor
Department of Microbiology, Federal University Otuoke, PMB 126, Yenegoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.
Chidi Prosper Orisekwu
Department of Microbiology, Federal University Otuoke, PMB 126, Yenegoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Aim: This study was conducted to formulate and evaluate the efficacy of a composite: coir pith + starch + plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), in sustaining the survival and growth of Zea mays (maize) seeds cultivated under flood stress.
Place and Duration of Study: Department of Microbiology Laboratory, Federal University Otuoke, Bayelsa State, Nigeria, between May and July 2024.
Methodology: Rhizobacteria were isolated, screened for plant-growth-promoting (PGP) traits; phosphate solubilisation and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production and further tested for PGP activity via seed germination bioassay. Composites were prepared by homogenizing coir pith, starch gel and standardized PGPR inoculum at a ratio of 2:24:20 (w/v), pelleted and dried at 28 oC. The efficacy of the composites was examined in a pot experiment by measuring shoot length (SL), root length (RL) and plant height (PH), of the treated maize seeds. Treatments were conducted in two sets (single composite pellet and 4 composite pellets); Set 1 (seeds + 1 composite pellet/pot, Control 1 and Control 2), Set 2 (seeds + 4 composite pellets/pot, Control 1 and Control 2). Controls 1 and 2 were; seeds + coir pith + starch only and maize seeds only, respectively. Set 1 was monitored for 2 weeks, and Set 2 for 7 days. Flood conditions were simulated by saturating the pots with water, without drainage, for 3 days.
Results: Five rhizobacteria were isolated; LCE tested positive for IAA production and phosphate solubilisation, SPP tested positive for IAA production only, and C tested positive for phosphate solubilization only. The growth performance of treated maize seeds under waterlogged condition in Set 1 indicated that the Control 1 (maize seeds + 1 coir pith + starch only pellet) was more effective than Control 2 and the other composites. The treatments in Set 1 did not support maize seed growth throughout the two-week monitoring period, except control 1 (maize seeds + 1 coir pith +starch only) which sustained seed survival and growth for 2 weeks. One way ANOVA indicated that the mean growth for control 1 was the same across the weeks as the p-value (p = 0.658) is greater than the 5% significance level (α = 0.05). In Set 2, at day 7, the observed survival and growth of maize seeds treated resulted from the application of 4 coir pith+starch+LCE (Priestia flexa) pellets. The mean SL, RL and PH recorded for the seeds were 2.6±0.2, 3.6±0.45 and 15.9±0.45 cm, respectively. LCE was identified by 16S rRNA sequencing as Priestia flexa.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates the potential of coir pith+ starch+Priestia flexa to mitigate waterlogging stress, sustain survival and growth of Zea mays seedlings.
Keywords: Coir pith, starch carrier, plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Priestia flexa, Zea mays, waterlogging stress, seedling survival, bioformulation, phosphate solubilisation, indole-3-acetic acid, maize growth